C elegans was shown previously to reverse direction in response to light (Burr 1985). In that study, 40-80% increases in reversal frequency over the background level varied with light intensity and wavelength in a normal way and were shown not to be due to radiant heating. Because large sample sizes are needed in order to detect small increases on top of the fluctuating frequency of spontaneous reversals, we have developed a computer automated tracking system that makes experimentation possible in a reasonable length of time. Under continuous near-infrared illumination, video images are digitized once each second and processed to find the new coordinates of up to 23 worms. Another program identifies reversals from the coordinates along the track. These are counted during a 10 s light period (1.6
x10 4 uW cm -2 blue-white broadband light) and a preceding 10 s dark period in each 40 s measurement cycle. There are 5 cycles per 200 s run. The number of reversals per 10 s measurement period, averaged over all worms and cycles during a run, counts as one independent measurement. Data are analyzed as a generalized randomized complete block design using the Proc Mixed procedure of SAS version 8. For detecting the effect of light, the difference in reversal frequency between the paired light and dark periods is analyzed in the same way. A new sample of worms was used for each run. About 30 synchronous six day-old, well-fed worms were washed off an OP50 culture plate and sedimented twice through behavior buffer (5.5 mM Tris + 34 mM NaCl). The worms were transferred in a drop of buffer to the edge of a 50-mm behavior plate and the plate was rotated to distribute the worms around the edge. The behavior plates were prepared by making 1.8% agar in 90% behavior buffer then drying to 90% of poured weight. Just before using, about 100 uL distilled water was distributed around the edge and allowed to soak in. The resulting lower osmolarity at the agar perimeter discouraged the worms from crawling near the edge. Worms were allowed to crawl into the 22x28 mm field of view and were tracked within 30-50 min of removal from the food. All procedures were carried out at 19 C. Sensitivity of the system under actual conditions was estimated by simulation, starting with data from an experiment with fed worms during which the light beam was blocked. Reversals were added to the data during the 'light' periods at frequencies of 0.01 to 0.10 per 10 s period (perP), and the data were reanalyzed. The increase in reversal frequency became significant at 0.050 perP (P = 0.037, n = 21 runs), a 45% increase over the background (dark period) frequency. A greater sensitivity would be expected at higher sample sizes. In all our experiments with well-fed worms, light had no significant effect on reversal frequency. To investigate the influence of starvation, we pooled worms from several food plates and put half on a food-free plate and half on a fresh food plate. After a starvation period, the fed and starved worms were tested in alternate runs. Light increased reversal frequency significantly in worms starved 20 h (+0.040 perP, +62%, P=0.049, n=51), but not significantly in worms starved 6 h (+0.013 perP, +12%, P = 0.4, n = 39). In both experiments, light had no significant effect on the fed controls (-0.023 perP, -15%, P = 0.2, n = 58 and -0.015 perP, -9%, P = 0.4, n = 42). In addition to being more responsive to light, starved worms had a significantly lower background (dark period) frequency. For the 0 h, 6 h and 20 h starved worms, average dark frequency (+/- SE) was 0.15 (0.013) perP, 0.11 (0.013) perP and 0.064 (0.012) perP, respectively. Thus, both background reversal frequency and responsiveness to light appear to be affected by starvation. In the previous study in which light responses were observed (Burr 1985), the worms may inadvertently have been starved.